Exclusive Wizz Air Pilot Resources Center
INSTANT ANSWERS FOR EVERY WIZZ AIR A320/321 QUESTION
Pre-configured AI copilots aligned with and built from trusted sources.
Master every oral exam, simulator ride, and line check—fast. 30-day money-back guarantee — see Refund Policy for details.
“MASTER EVERY LINE CHECK — IN 7 DAYS OR LESS”
What You'll Gain:
Transform your A320/321 proficiency with resources designed specifically for Wizz Air
- Your Always-Ready Technical Co-Pilot — An intelligent “Thought Partner” resources that enhances your decision-making during both reflective and critical moments, giving you unmatched confidence for flights, line checks, and simulator sessions.
- Save Both Time and Energy: Find insights immediately, without hassles
- Exam Confidence: Interactive Q&A system based on actual Wizz Air assessment patterns
- Career Advancement: Demonstrate exceptional technical knowledge in your next evaluation
- Reduced Study Time – Moving from hours of manual searching to instant answers
Your Exclusive Wizz Air Benefit:
- 85% SAVINGS: Just $6/month instead of $39/month (discount pre-applied).
- Immediate Access: No waiting period, start preparing today
Unlock Your Resources in 60 Seconds:
- Enter your Wizz Air email address.
- Begin your enhanced preparation journey
Additional Benefits:
- Always-Ready Copilot – Type your question, get a reference-backed answer in < 3 seconds.
- Line-Check Confidence – Mirrors Wizz Air technical assessments so nothing surprises you.
- Time Saved – Replace hours of search with instant clarification.
- 85% Crew Discount – Verified Wizz Air e-mail unlocks $6/monthly pricing.
- Career Edge – Demonstrate system mastery in command boards.
Limited to verified Wizz Air flight crew only
- Retail $39/month → $6/month (or $59/year)
- 30-day money-back guarantee—see Refund Policy for details.
Wizz Air Email *
Before a command assessment, this resources will give you the structured preparation you will find essential. The company-specific content makes all the difference.
THESE ARE YOUR EXCLUSIVE WIZZ AIR PILOT GATEWAY PRODUCTS DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR WIZZ AIR A320/A321 FLIGHT CREW
They are intuitively and precisely engineered for Wizz Air operations
SHARPEN YOUR PROFESSIONAL EDGE
As a Wizz Air pilot, your career demands technical excellence. We’ve created two resources that match your exact needs.
- Oral Exam Prepper: Master your technical assessments with confidence
- "Heat of Battle" Answers: Access critical knowledge when it matters most
WHAT SETS THIS APART FOR WIZZ AIR PILOTS
- Wizz Air Procedural Alignment: Content specifically mapped to your company manuals, so you can master your technical assessments
- A320/321 Type-Specific: Focused exclusively on your aircraft systems and limitations
- Operational Relevance: Created by A320 Pilot Paul Toensing specifically for Wizz Air operations
VALUE PROPOSITION:
- The “Oral Exam Prepper” resources will give you the clearly structured insights for any preparations or discussions, and you will come to find it increasingly indispensable.
- The “Heat of Battle”- Answers resources augments and improves technical deliberations before and during flights, line checks and simulator sessions, just as a great “Thought Partner” should.
- Wizz Air-specific content eliminates wasted time, by avoiding unwelcome rabbit holes. with fuzzy or baffling “guidance”.
RENOVATE YOUR TECHNICAL READINESS TODAY
- From Complexity to Clarity. From Preparation to Performance.
- Your Expertise Amplified.
Interactive oral exam preparation thought partner for Wizz Air A320/321 flight crew. Collaborative Examiner-style Q&A that builds crystallized understanding.
Interactive rapid-reference study partner for Wizz Air A320/321 crews. Citation-backed answers, grounded in operational references. For exam preparation and training.
We do not reproduce or distribute airline-proprietary content.
Not ready to subscribe yet? Start with the free card.
Download the A320 Unreliable Speed Recovery Card — the immediate-actions reference in a pocket-ready format. No subscription needed.
Know which protections you keep in Alternate Law — before you find yourself in a bind.
Free 2-page A320 Alternate Law / ADR Isolation Quick Reference. Memory items, protection status, ADR isolation logic, BUSS activation, and the complete six-step sequence.
Think you're ready for the oral? Prove it in 4 minutes.
7 scenario-based questions. No obviously wrong answers. Your diagnostic profile tells you where the gaps actually are.
❓ FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Is this product specifically built for Wizz Air operations?
Yes. The content is mapped directly to Wizz Air A320/A321 company manuals and operational procedures — not generic Airbus material. Every answer reflects Wizz Air-specific standards.
What two products are included for Wizz Air pilots?
The Oral Exam Prepper is your conversational oral-exam coach — it uses examiner-style questioning to replicate how an examiner actually conducts an oral, building real understanding rather than rote memorization. The Heat of Battle — Answers is the no-nonsense technical authority — rapid-response, citation-backed, and variant-aware, delivering precise, citation-backed answers grounded in operational references. One challenges you to think. The other gives you the answer when you need it now.
How do I unlock the $6/month pilot discount?
Simply enter your Wizz Air company email address. The system verifies your email format to confirm you are active Wizz Air flight crew and automatically applies the 85% crew discount.
Does it cover both the A320 and A321 variants?
Yes. Both the A320 and A321 are covered within the same product, reflecting the full Wizz Air fleet that pilots operate across.
Is there a risk in trying it?
None. Every subscription includes a 30-day money-back guarantee — see Refund Policy for details. You can cancel at any time.
You're dispatched A321 NEO to a CEE outstation with a 2,200-meter runway. METAR shows light snow, OAT minus 4°C, braking action reported "Medium to Poor." Your planned final reserve is 1,200 kg. On approach, ATC assigns a runway change to a shorter runway with no RCAM update.
What is your RCAM code for the original runway, what changes with the runway reassignment, and at what point does your fuel state require a specific ATC call?
RCAM Code 2 (Medium to Poor) for the original runway. With the runway change and no updated RCAM report, you cannot upgrade your assessment - the downgrade-only principle applies. You must re-assess landing performance against the shorter runway using Code 2 criteria. If the new runway cannot satisfy your landing distance requirements, you cannot accept it.
Meanwhile, if unanticipated holding or vectors may result in landing with less than 1,200 kg (your A321 NEO final reserve) plus alternate fuel, you request "DELAY INFORMATION." If committed and any clearance change risks landing below 1,200 kg: "MINIMUM FUEL." Below 1,200 kg predicted at the nearest suitable aerodrome: "MAYDAY FUEL."
"You're dispatching from a Central/Eastern European outstation with a short/narrow runway and obstacle-driven SIDs. Talk me through what Wizz Air requires you to verify in the aerodrome usability/performance assessment, and what you do if landing-distance dispatch criteria cannot be met."
Aerodrome Usability Assessment
Before operating into a new route or airport, Wizz Air requires an analysis addressing obstacle clearance for all phases of flight, runway dimensions and pavement loading, navigation aids and lighting, weather considerations, emergency services, fuel burn calculations, ATC services, critical engine inoperative operations, depressurization over critical areas, irregular pre-threshold terrain or known deficiencies, and special airport classification. Wizz publishes LVO tables, airport briefings, and route information appendices in OMC - Airports, available via the onboard EFB/online library.
Approved Aerodrome Baseline
Wizz only approves aerodromes where runway length and characteristics are sufficient for aircraft performance requirements, suitable instrument approaches/ATS/lighting/comms/weather reporting/nav aids exist, and RFFS category is sufficient. Approved aerodromes (A/B/C) are listed in OMC - Airports.
Dispatch When Landing Performance Is Limiting
If the runway may be wet: use AFM wet landing distance if provided (not less than dry requirement), or if not provided, use 115% or more of dry required landing distance.
If the runway may be contaminated: LDA must be at least the dry/wet dispatch landing distance or 115% or more of the approved contaminated landing distance data, whichever is greater.
Alternate Requirement
If the Commander cannot comply with the most-likely-assigned runway criteria and the runway at ETA may be wet or contaminated, the aircraft shall only be dispatched if one alternate is designated. If the Commander cannot comply with the most-favourable-runway/still-air criteria at a destination where the runway may be contaminated and landing depends on a specific wind component, two alternates must be designated. In both cases the alternate(s) must allow compliance with the applicable dry or wet/contaminated dispatch landing criteria.
Takeoff / SID Constraint Discipline
The engine-out flight path is flown according to the takeoff briefing (EOSID/SID/radar vectors). Acceleration altitude is a compromise between obstacle clearance and thrust-limiting time. If conditions change (wind/runway/contamination), recompute performance. Never accept an intersection takeoff until takeoff performance has been checked.
"You arrive at a CEE outstation in freezing conditions: runway reports are inconsistent and de-icing capability is limited. How do you assess runway contamination, decide on de/anti-ice, manage holdover time, and confirm the aircraft is legally released?"
Clean Wing Is Non-Negotiable
Performance is certified on a clean wing. Wing temperature can remain significantly below 0°C after cruise even if OAT is above 0°C, causing upper-wing icing and light frost under the wing. Only 3 mm frost on the underside of the wing tank area is acceptable. The Captain determines whether ground de/anti-ice is required based on exterior inspection of all vital surfaces from clear vantage points.
RCAM Logic for Runway Assessment
RCAM combines runway state/contaminant, PIREP braking action, and estimated surface friction (ESF) into six Landing Performance Codes. Critical rule: make a primary assessment from contaminant type/depth and OAT, downgrade if reports indicate worse, do not upgrade the primary assessment.
| Code | Condition | Note |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Dry | Baseline certified performance |
| 5 | Good | |
| 4 | Good to Medium | |
| 3 | Medium | |
| 2 | Medium to Poor | Loose contaminants - ESF unreliable |
| 1 | Poor | Downgrade only - never upgrade |
De/Anti-Icing Policy at Limited Stations
Wizz policy is compliant with CAT.OP.MPA.250 and aligned with SAE Global Aircraft De-icing Standards. HOT tables are based on FAA guidance. One-step: single application removes contamination and provides protection. Two-step: Type I removes contamination, followed by Type II/IV for anti-ice protection.
If no ground engineer is available, the handling agent must report to the Commander before starting, provide the anti-icing code (type/mixture) and actual start time, and the aircraft must be thoroughly checked after completion.
"You're rostered A320 today and A321 tomorrow. Give me the operational differences that actually matter for Wizz - fuel policy numbers and at least one abnormal configuration difference that can bite you."
Final Reserve Fuel by Variant
Wizz defines final reserve fuel as 30 minutes holding at 1,500 ft in standard conditions.
| Variant | Final Reserve |
|---|---|
| A320 CEO | 1,200 kg |
| A320 NEO | 1,000 kg |
| A321 CEO | 1,500 kg |
| A321 NEO | 1,200 kg |
On the A321 you are protecting a larger fixed reserve figure, which can change dispatch feasibility at fuel-sensitive alternates or airport clusters in marginal weather.
Abnormal Configuration Difference
In a degraded case (landing with one engine and no green + yellow hydraulics), the A321 has a specific landing flap recommendation: FLAP 3. Crews who do not consciously register the type swap risk applying the wrong abnormal configuration.
Circling Technique Reminder
Airbus guidance uses CONF 3, gear down, and F speed as the baseline for circling setup. This is especially relevant when crews swap types and must remain stabilized inside circling protection.
"Explain alpha protection and alpha floor logic. What are the activation cues, what is TOGA LK, and exactly how do you recover - including the use of the thrust-lever disconnect pushbutton?"
Alpha Protection
If the aircraft enters alpha protection, the PF should exit as quickly as possible by easing the sidestick forward to reduce AOA, while adding power as needed.
Alpha Floor Trigger Logic
When alpha floor protection is triggered, the autothrust engages and commands TOGA on all engines. TOGA LK is displayed on the FMA. The only means to deselect TOGA LK is to turn autothrust off. The manuals do not restrict alpha floor activation to a specific autothrust mode.
CAT II Procedural Context
Above 1,000 ft: check speed, disconnect and re-engage autothrust mode - TOGA LK should disappear from the FMA.
Below 1,000 ft: go around if visual references are not sufficient.
Alpha floor protection is inhibited below 100 ft at landing.
TOGA LK Recovery
TOGA LK is the latched TOGA-thrust condition. Once safe speed is restored, cancel alpha floor with the disconnect pushbutton (on either thrust lever), then set appropriate thrust and re-engage automation as appropriate.
"You're inbound to an airport surrounded by terrain. How do you use EGPWS terrain functions on the A320 family, and what changes in your approach briefing to manage terrain risk?"
Terrain Display Behavior
The Terrain Awareness Display (TAD) provides terrain display on the ND independently of aircraft relative altitude. Terrain appears in various densities of green, yellow, red, or magenta depending on threat level. Areas without terrain data appear magenta. The "white/2,000 ft" color code claimed in earlier outputs is not supported by the WZZ FCOM.
Alert Behavior
If an EGPWS terrain/obstacle alert occurs and TERR ON ND was not already selected, terrain and obstacles automatically appear and the TERR ON ND pushbutton ON light illuminates. If the current ND mode or range is unsuitable, the ND provides prompts such as "TERR CHANGE MODE" or "TERR REDUCE RANGE."
Mountain Briefing Additions
Beyond the normal approach briefing, explicitly include: MSA/sector altitude and highest terrain relative to planned vertical profile; missed approach path relative to terrain; navigation accuracy expectation (reduced accuracy can deactivate enhanced modes, requiring raw-data crosscheck); and ND setup for terrain SA early in the approach.
"Explain Wizz fuel policy structure (what makes up the planned fuel), and then tell me exactly when you request delay info, declare MINIMUM FUEL, and declare MAYDAY FUEL."
Planned Fuel Structure
Wizz fuel planning includes: taxi fuel, trip fuel, contingency fuel (including statistical methods), alternate fuel (go-around from MDA/DH through approach/landing at alternate; if two alternates required, plan for the one requiring greater fuel), final reserve fuel (30 minutes holding at 1,500 ft standard, with variant-specific values), additional fuel (when required), arrival delay fuel (allocated at planning for anticipated holding), and extra fuel at Commander discretion.
In-Flight Fuel Management Calls
"You're flying with a much less experienced pilot in a high-workload environment. What exact CRM/TEM framework do you apply, and what task-sharing rules prevent errors when ECAM and automation compete for attention?"
Golden Rules
Fly, Navigate, Communicate - in that order, with appropriate task-sharing. PF focuses on flight path/speed/trajectory control; PM actively monitors and calls deviations. "Navigate" explicitly includes: know where you are, where you should be, where you should go, and where the weather/terrain/obstacles are.
Use the appropriate level of automation at all times. Understand the FMA at all times - crosscheck FCU/MCDU actions via FMA/PFD/ND. If insufficient time to analyze, change automation level (managed to selected, selected to manual).
ECAM Task-Sharing
First priority: maintain a safe flight path. After PF calls "ECAM ACTIONS": PF flies/navigates/communicates; PM manages the failure on PF command, reads ECAM/checklist, performs actions on PF command, requests PF confirmation to clear actions. PM never touches thrust levers.
Critical/guarded switches must be crosschecked by both pilots before action. PF may call "STOP ECAM" at any time. In failures during takeoff/go-around: delay ECAM actions until approximately 400 ft and stable on a safe trajectory.
"In a dual hydraulic failure scenario, tell me exactly what the PTU can and cannot do, what your remaining hydraulic source is likely to be, and what you must anticipate operationally for the approach."
PTU Fundamentals
PTU capability: A bidirectional PTU enables the yellow system to pressurize the green system and vice versa. It operates automatically when differential pressure between green and yellow exceeds 500 PSI.
PTU limitation: Hydraulic fluid cannot be transferred from one system to another. A system that has lost fluid cannot be "refilled" by PTU action.
Remaining hydraulic source: If green and yellow are unavailable, the blue system remains, normally pressurized by its electric pump and in emergency by the RAT-driven pump.
Approach Management
Plan early for the operational consequence set: longer landing distance margins, possible system limitations, and clear coordination with ATC/airport services. Apply strict task-sharing to prevent heads-down loss of control margin. Note the A321-specific landing flap recommendation (FLAP 3) in the stated degraded hydraulic and engine case.
"Give me your RTO decision criteria. Use the 100-knot gate and go-minded philosophy, and tell me what changes in winter from a short, performance-limited runway."
RTO Hazard Factors
Factors that detract from a successful RTO: tire damage, brakes worn or not working correctly, error in gross weight determination, incorrect performance calculations, incorrect runway line-up technique, initial brake temperature, delay in initiating stopping procedure, and runway friction coefficient lower than expected.
Pre-Takeoff Discipline
Confirm computed takeoff data reflects actual conditions. If conditions change, recalculate. Crew should not be pressured into accepting takeoff clearance before fully ready. Never accept an intersection takeoff until takeoff performance has been checked.
The 100-Knot Gate
Below 100 kt: Captain will seriously consider rejecting for any ECAM warning/caution.
Above 100 kt approaching V1, be go-minded and only reject for: major failure, sudden loss of thrust, any indication the aircraft will not fly safely, any red ECAM warning, or these specific amber cautions: F/CTL SIDESTICK FAULT, ENG FAIL, ENG REVERSER FAULT, ENG REVERSE UNLOCKED, ENG 1(2) THR LEVER FAULT.
If a tire fails within 20 kt of V1 and debris does not cause noticeable engine parameter fluctuations, it is better to get airborne, reduce fuel load, and land with full runway length available.
Winter / Short-Runway Impact
The hazard drivers (especially friction lower than expected and line-up technique) become more acute. Briefing discipline and the "no intersection until performance checked" posture become operationally critical.
"You're flying into a CEE airport with no precision approach. Explain how you fly an NPA with step-down fixes, and how you set up and fly a circling approach without falling into automation traps."
Non-Precision Approach Strategy
NPA types include VOR, NDB, LOC/LOC-BC, and R-NAV. The Airbus strategy: fly the NPA "ILS alike" with the same mental model. Guidance modes are referred to the FMS flight plan consolidated by raw data. LOC-only is the exception (use LOC mode and localizer scale). AP use is recommended to reduce workload.
Navigation accuracy trap: if NAV ACCY DNGRADED or GPS PRIMARY LOST occurs during a managed NPA, crosscheck accuracy. If positive, continue managed. If negative, revert to selected approach with raw data. For ATC vectors to final: use DIR TO FAF with RADIAL INBND to create an ILS-like beam.
Circling Approach Setup
Preparation: in active F-PLN enter STAR + instrument approach + missed approach. Insert F speed constraint at FAF because circling is flown CONF 3, gear down, F speed. In SEC F-PLN: copy active, insert landing runway, keep discontinuity.
Flying: remain within circling area with required visual references at all times. Selected modes with AP are recommended. Critical rule: must NOT fly the pattern with AP engaged in NAV mode. Use ND ROSE with low range for SA. Initiate base turn when approximately 45 degrees from runway threshold. Circling area based on 180 kt max for Cat C.
Loss of Visual References
If visual references are lost: climb and leave the circling area into the missed approach of the initial instrument approach.
Critical automation trap: if SEC F-PLN has been activated, the FMS go-around is associated with the landing runway (not the instrument approach). In that case, fly go-around using selected guidance, following the pre-briefed missed approach.
Smoke Logic: In the SMOKE/FUMES procedure, why is it critical to return VENTILATION BLOWER and EXTRACT to AUTO before isolating a pack?
OVRD blower/extract can defeat single-pack press.
System Fact
When both VENTILATION BLOWER and EXTRACT are in OVRD, a single pack may not be able to maintain cabin pressure; the SMOKE/FUMES procedure returns BLOWER/EXTRACT to AUTO before selecting a pack OFF.
Operational Risk / Trap
Isolating a pack with BLOWER/EXTRACT still OVRD can drive unwanted cabin altitude/pressurization issues and mislead crews into chasing the wrong “pack fault” or “pressurization problem.”
Manual Verification
653645391-WZZ-FCOM-19May2021.pdf — PRO-ABN-SMOKE [QRH] SMOKE / FUMES / AVNCS SMOKE, P22/50
Fire Detection: How does the A320 fire detection system handle a ‘Dual Loop’ failure versus a single loop failure?
One loop failed: warning stays; both loops: lost.
System Fact
Fire warning triggers if both loops A and B send a fire signal, or one loop sends a fire signal and the other is failed; a fault in one loop does not affect warning, but a loop-fault caution appears with one loop failed or both loops failed (or FDU failure).
Operational Risk / Trap
With both loops failed, you should assume loss of fire detection (no warning reliability); don’t “wait for a fire warning” to confirm—use other cues and act early.
Manual Verification
653645391-WZZ-FCOM-19May2021.pdf — DSC-26-20-10 Fire Detection and Fire Detection and Detection Fault Logic, P1/2 and P2/2
Discharge Logic: What is the specific ‘Logic Trigger’ that causes the DISCH light to illuminate on the Engine Fire panel?
DISCH light = extinguisher bottle pressure low.
System Fact
On the ENG fire AGENT 1(2) pushbutton-switches, DISCH illuminates amber when the corresponding fire extinguisher bottle has lost pressure.
Operational Risk / Trap
DISCH confirms bottle pressure loss (discharge/pressure drop), not that the fire is extinguished; avoid prematurely expending the second agent without reassessing indications and timing.
Manual Verification
653645391-WZZ-FCOM-19May2021.pdf — DSC-26-20-20 FIRE Panel (AGENT 1(2) PB-SW), P2/6
The OEP contains 300+ system traps like these. Full cross-system logic, Wizz Air FCOM alignment, and interactive oral exam Q&A — ready in 60 seconds.
Hone Your Edge →Hydraulic Priority Logic: When GREEN system pressure drops, which specific systems lose hydraulic supply first due to priority valves, and what is the logic behind this isolation?
GREEN low P: heavy users are cut to save F/CTL.
System Fact
Priority valves cut off hydraulic power to heavy-load users when system pressure gets low; on the GREEN system, heavy-load users include landing gear/doors actuation (GREEN actuates all gear and doors) and normal braking/autobrake (normal braking uses GREEN pressure).
Operational Risk / Trap
Crews may chase “save the system” by cycling gear/brakes during low GREEN pressure; that can accelerate pressure decay and remove what’s left for essential control, while also creating surprise loss of normal brake availability (reversion to alternate braking logic).
Manual Verification
653645391-WZZ-FCOM-19May2021.pdf — DSC-29-10-20 (Priority Valves), P 2/6; DSC-32-10-10 (Landing Gears and Doors Operation), P 4/6; DSC-32-30-10 (Normal Braking), P 5/8
Weather Radar Tilt Management: What is the specific risk of leaving the Radar Tilt in ‘AUTO’ while maneuvering around high-reflectivity cells at low altitudes during the approach phase?
AUTO tilt can overscan, understating cell threat close-in.
System Fact
Autotilt automatically adjusts antenna tilt to optimize detection and reduce ground clutter (and below 2 300 ft AGL it also biases for short-range detection/PWS scanning); incorrect tilt/overscanning can cause the ND to show only the less-reflective part of a storm cell, leading to underestimation or non-detection.
Operational Risk / Trap
In tight vectoring/turning around red returns at low altitude, AUTO tilt can “clean up” the picture (ground clutter management + scan logic) and hide the most reflective core/top cues; crews may commit into a narrowing gap or too-close deviation because the displayed intensity/shape is misleading without active manual tilt cross-checking.
Manual Verification
653645391-WZZ-FCOM-19May2021.pdf — DSC-34-SURV-30-10 (Weather Radar Description/Autotilt), P 2/4; FCTM A320 20150318 - ELIB.pdf, SI-070 (Use of Radar: Overscanning risk), P 3/12; SI-070 (Automatic Tilt Control/Approach tilt guidance), P 6/12
Unreliable Speed: What are the specific pitch and power targets for an Unreliable Airspeed event during the initial climb (flaps 1, 2, or 3)?
Unreliable IAS climb: 15 deg/TOGA then 10 deg/CLB.
System Fact
Memory items command PITCH/THRUST targets: below THRUST RED ALT 15 deg/TOGA; above THRUST RED ALT and below FL100 10 deg/CLB; above THRUST RED ALT and above FL100 5 deg/CLB, with FLAPS in CONF 0/1/2/3 to MAINTAIN CURRENT CONF.
Operational Risk / Trap
Changing config or reducing thrust early while IAS is unreliable can quickly put the aircraft near stall/overspeed; lock pitch/thrust first, then troubleshoot.
Manual Verification
653645391-WZZ-FCOM-19May2021.pdf — PRO-ABN-NAV [MEM] UNRELIABLE SPEED INDICATION, P1/190
Emergency Descent: During an Emergency Descent, what is the specific risk of leaving the cabin in Smoke Configuration?
Smoke removal config starts cabin depressurization.
System Fact
The REMOVAL OF SMOKE / FUMES procedure initiates descent to FL100/MEA-MORA while increasing cabin altitude to 10 000 ft/MEA-MORA, and states cabin depressurization starts when descent is initiated.
Operational Risk / Trap
If you leave the aircraft in smoke-removal style cabin configuration during an emergency descent, the cabin altitude can rise aggressively (and may be harder to control with reduced pack capability), increasing hypoxia risk and the chance of passenger oxygen mask deployment/pressure-related injuries.
Manual Verification
653645391-WZZ-FCOM-19May2021.pdf — PRO-ABN-SMOKE [QRH] REMOVAL OF SMOKE / FUMES, P29/50
Terrain Escape Logic: During a GPWS ‘PULL UP’ alert, what are the specific ‘Memory Items’ for the pitch and thrust, and does the autopilot remain engaged during the maneuver?
PULL UP: full backstick and TOGA; AP OFF.
System Fact
Memory items call for PITCH: PULL UP (full backstick and maintain) and THRUST LEVERS: TOGA; during night or IMC the autopilot is selected OFF as part of the immediate response.
Operational Risk / Trap
Leaving speed brakes out or changing configuration early can ruin climb gradient; keep speed brakes retracted and do not change configuration (slats/flaps/gear) until clear of obstacle.
Manual Verification
653645391-WZZ-FCOM-19May2021.pdf — PRO-ABN-SURV [MEM] EGPWS CAUTIONS, P 1/8
If you didn’t know the 15 deg/TOGA trap — you’re memorizing the wrong numbers. The OEP drills every memory item with the exact logic behind each one.
Hone Your Edge →Emergency Descent Logic: During an Emergency Descent, what is the specific ‘Inhibition Rule’ for the landing gear if the descent is initiated due to a structural failure versus a standard rapid depressurization?
Structural damage: consider gear; if used, slow VLO.
System Fact
With structural damage suspected, the procedure is MANEUVER WITH CARE and CONSIDER L/G EXTENSION; if the landing gear is extended, speed must be reduced to VLO/VLE.
Operational Risk / Trap
Treating gear as “automatic drag” can overstress the airframe. Extending the landing gear without reducing speed to VLO/VLE, or aggressively maneuvering with suspected structural damage, increases the risk of further structural failure.
Manual Verification
653645391-WZZ-FCOM-19May2021.pdf — PRO-ABN-MISC, [MEM] EMER DESCENT, P 1/34; PRO-ABN-CAB_PR, CAB PR EXCESS CAB ALT (Cont’d), P 3/14
Alpha Floor Protection: What is the specific ‘Logic Trigger’ that causes an Alpha Floor engagement, and under what flight control law degradations is this protection entirely lost?
A.FLOOR when α>αfloor or >14° nose-up input.
System Fact
FAC triggers alpha-floor when AoA is above a configuration-based threshold (and in CONF 3/FULL the threshold decreases with deceleration rate) or when sidestick nose-up deflection exceeds 14° with pitch attitude or AoA protection active; alpha-floor is lost under alternate or direct law.
Operational Risk / Trap
Pulling through αPROT can auto-command TOGA at low energy. If in alternate/direct law, crews may expect alpha-floor but it is unavailable, so low-speed events must be managed without TOGA auto-thrust protection.
Manual Verification
653645391-WZZ-FCOM-19May2021.pdf — DSC-22_40-30 Flight Envelope Function (Alpha-Floor Protection), P 4/4; DSC-27-20-20 Flight Control System - Reconfiguration Control Laws, P 13/16
Cargo Smoke Protection: In the event of a Cargo Smoke indication, what is the specific operational difference between the ‘Agent 1’ and ‘Agent 2’ discharge logic, and how is concentration maintained over time?
Cargo smoke: BTL1 fast; BTL2 metered long.
System Fact
Bottle/Agent 1 discharges quickly (approximately 60 s) to achieve initial extinguishing concentration, while Bottle/Agent 2 discharge is flow-metered to maintain concentration for an extended duration (at least 75 min); operationally, the procedure calls for AGENT 2 discharge 60 min after AGENT 1.
Operational Risk / Trap
Early or unnecessary AGENT 2 discharge destroys the “holding” capability; also expect SMOKE warning to persist after discharge (detectors are sensitive to agent and residual gases), so don’t misread a continuing warning as “agent ineffective” and waste the second bottle.
Manual Verification
653645391-WZZ-FCOM-19May2021.pdf — DSC-26-50-10 (Cargo Compartments Fire Extinguishing), P 6/12; PRO-ABN-SMOKE (SMOKE FWD CARGO SMOKE), P 45/50
Reverser Malfunction Handling: In the event of an ‘ENG REVERSER UNLOCKED’ warning in flight, what is the specific ‘Logic Trigger’ that determines whether the FADEC will automatically command the engine to idle?
FADEC idles if reverser feedback exceeds 5% deploy.
System Fact
The FADEC automatically selects thrust to IDLE in flight (or on ground) when it detects inadvertent reverser deployment, triggered when thrust reverser feedback position is above 5% deployed.
Operational Risk / Trap
Treating “UNLOCKED” as purely a nuisance can be fatal if it transitions toward deployment—buffet/asymmetry can appear fast; if idle is auto-selected, comply immediately (idle the lever, speed limits, and LAND ASAP logic) and don’t mask the event with thrust/A/THR chasing.
Manual Verification
653645391-WZZ-FCOM-19May2021.pdf — DSC-70-70 (Thrust Reverser System Protection), P 6/6; PRO-ABN-ENG (ENG 1(2) REVERSE UNLOCKED), P 230/300
Engine Fire Management: What is the specific ‘Verification Logic’ used to determine if an Engine Fire has been successfully extinguished before deciding to discharge the second fire agent bottle?
2nd bottle if FIRE warning still on after 30 s.
System Fact
Discharge AGENT 2 only if the fire warning remains 30 seconds after AGENT 1 discharge.
Operational Risk / Trap
Discharging too early wastes agent; wait the full 30 s. Misreading transient indications can lead to unnecessary AGENT 2 use and leave no remaining fire-extinguishing capability for a re-ignition.
Manual Verification
653645391-WZZ-FCOM-19May2021.pdf — PRO-ABN-ENG, ENG 1(2) FIRE (IN FLIGHT), P 139/300
Three logic traps. Three checkride failures waiting to happen. The OEP puts you through every one — interactively — before your TRE does.
Hone Your Edge →Descent Energy Management: When using ‘DES’ mode, what is the specific risk of the aircraft entering a ‘V/S’ reversion if the FMGS speed profile is significantly exceeded while in a high-drag configuration?
Loss of NAV makes DES revert to V/S on current rate.
System Fact
When NAV mode disengages (manual or automatic) with DES engaged, the vertical mode reverts to V/S on the current value; the aircraft is no longer guided on the descent profile and constraints are disregarded.
Operational Risk / Trap
A steep inherited V/S can drive a VMO/VFE event and triple click. After DES to V/S reversion, the AP may pitch down to hold the V/S, causing acceleration toward VMO/VFE; speed protection may then temporarily abandon the V/S target to maintain VMAX, creating high workload, missed constraints, and energy instability if not promptly recognized.
Manual Verification
653645391-WZZ-FCOM-19May2021.pdf — DSC-22_30-75 Mode Reversions, P 2/14 and P 13/14; FCTM A320 20150318 - ELIB.pdf, NO-090 Descent (Selected Descent / Mode Reversion), P 6/8
Icing Identification: According to the manual, what is the specific ‘Visual Requirement’ for identifying ice accretion on the airframe before activating Engine Anti-Ice versus Wing Anti-Ice?
ENG A.ICE is not visual; WING A.ICE is evidence-based.
System Fact
Engine anti-ice must be turned ON when icing conditions exist/are anticipated and should not wait for visible ice; wing anti-ice must be turned ON if there is evidence of ice accretion such as ice on the visual indicators or on the wipers (or SEVERE ICE DETECTED alert).
Operational Risk / Trap
Waiting for visible ice before ENG A.ICE is a flameout trap. Delaying engine anti-ice until ice is seen increases engine icing risk, while delaying wing anti-ice after evidence appears allows wing leading-edge accumulation and degraded margins.
Manual Verification
653645391-WZZ-FCOM-19May2021.pdf — PRO-NOR-SOP-16 Standard Operating Procedures - Descent Preparation, P 9/10; PRO-NOR-SUP-ADVWXR Supplementary Procedures - Adverse Weather, MINIMUM SPEED WITH ICE ACCRETION, P 8/16
Compliance & Accuracy — Manual Versions Used
653645391-WZZ-FCOM-19May2021.pdf — Wizz Air A320/321 FCOM (Primary Reference)
FCTM A320 20150318 - ELIB.pdf — A320 Flight Crew Technique Manual (Secondary Reference)
Content sourced exclusively from Wizz Air-issued documentation. Not affiliated with Airbus or Wizz Air.
If you didn’t know the PTU overheat trap, the FADEC 5% rule, or the alpha-floor law degradation chain —
you’re a passenger in your own checkride.
